Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
judithcurry.com | ||
| | | | |
scienceofdoom.com
|
|
| | | | | InNew Theory Proves AGW Wrong! I said: So, ifNew Theory Proves AGW Wrong is an exciting subject, you will continue to enjoy the subject for many years, because I'm sure there will be many more papers from physicists "proving" the theory wrong. However, it's likely that if they are papers "falsifying" the foundational "greenhouse" gas... | |
| | | | |
climateguy.blogspot.com
|
|
| | | | | The original version of this article was published on the Activist Teacher blog on May 8, 2011. The present (SECOND version) is the May 12, ... | |
| | | | |
www.drroyspencer.com
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The discussion revolves around the greenhouse effect and its role in global warming, with conflicting views on the magnitude of warming, the energy balance, and the role of solar activity. Key points include debates over the actual warming effect of greenhouse gases (GHGs), the energy imbalance, and the attribution of recent warming to natural causes versus human-induced factors. There are also mentions of solar activity, satellite data, and the role of the oceans in heat storage. The conversation includes references to scientific studies, models, and data sources such as the AIRS satellite and Schuckmann et al. 2023, highlighting the complexity and ongoing nature of climate science discussions. | |
| | | | |
climateofsophistry.com
|
|
| | | I think that it is better to use a spherical Earth with the real solar input to do an energy budget, rather than a flat Earth with 1/4 the solar input like peer-reviewed and pedagogical climate science does things. It makes a difference, because with 1/4 solar input of S(1-a)/4, this equates to a solar... | ||
