/explore
|
You are here 
|
www.alignmentforum.org | ||
| | | | |
www.lesswrong.com
|
|
| | | | | These are some research notes on whether we could reduce AI takeover risk by cooperating with unaligned AIs. I think the best and most readable publi... | |
| | | | |
www.greaterwrong.com
|
|
| | | | | Suppose that 1% of the world's resources are controlled by unaligned AI, and 99% of the world's resources are controlled by humans. We might hope that at least 99% of the universe's resources end up being used for stuff-humans-like (in expectation). Jessica Taylor argued for this conclusion in Strategies for Coalitions in Unit-Sum Games: if the humans divide into 99 groups each of which acquires influence as effectively as the unaligned AI, then by symmetry each group should end, up with as much influence as the AI, i.e. they should end up with 99% of the influence. | |
| | | | |
joecarlsmith.com
|
|
| | | | | Examining the conditions for rogue AI behavior. | |
| | | | |
scottaaronson.blog
|
|
| | | Update (Dec. 17): Some of you might enjoy a 3-hour podcast I recently did with Lawrence Krauss, which was uploaded to YouTube just yesterday. The first hour is about my life and especially childhood (!); the second hour's about quantum computing; the third hour's about computational complexity, computability, and AI safety. I'm being attacked on... | ||
