/explore
|
You are here 
|
www.alignmentforum.org | ||
| | | | |
www.greaterwrong.com
|
|
| | | | | Suppose that 1% of the world's resources are controlled by unaligned AI, and 99% of the world's resources are controlled by humans. We might hope that at least 99% of the universe's resources end up being used for stuff-humans-like (in expectation). Jessica Taylor argued for this conclusion in Strategies for Coalitions in Unit-Sum Games: if the humans divide into 99 groups each of which acquires influence as effectively as the unaligned AI, then by symmetry each group should end, up with as much influence as the AI, i.e. they should end up with 99% of the influence. | |
| | | | |
www.lesswrong.com
|
|
| | | | | These are some research notes on whether we could reduce AI takeover risk by cooperating with unaligned AIs. I think the best and most readable publi... | |
| | | | |
blog.redwoodresearch.org
|
|
| | | | | More thoughts on making deals with schemers | |
| | | | |
zhengdongwang.com
|
|
| | | Zhengdong Wang's personal website | ||
