Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
webb.nasa.gov | ||
| | | | |
blogs.nasa.gov
|
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
asd.gsfc.nasa.gov
|
|
| | | | | I get a lot of questions asking why the James Webb Space Telescope is infrared, and how its images can hope to compare to the (primarily) optical Hubble Space Telescope. Why would NASA build something that isn't going to capture beautiful images exactly like Hubble does? The short answer to this is that JWST will absolutely capture beautiful images of the universe, even if it won't see exactly what Hubble does. (Spoiler: it will see a lot of things even better.) There are legit scientific reasons for JWS... | |
| | | | |
sci.esa.int
|
|
| | | | | Visible and infrared views of the Horsehead Nebula | |
| | | | |
www.livescience.com
|
|
| | | Records of orcas hunting sharks in the Gulf of California are on the rise, as experts say we may have underestimated how much this happens. | ||
