Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
bycommonconsent.com | ||
| | | | |
laf443259520.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | How the greater church became a Feminist tit-pit. The Bible teaches us that man was created in God's image, and that God always and only reveals Himself as being of the masculine sex. This original teaching has been replaced by various perversions, at many points in history, as false religion continually is raised up against... | |
| | | | |
www.pentecostalnews.com
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The discussion centers around the interpretation of biblical passages regarding gender roles, particularly focusing on complementarianism versus egalitarianism. Key points include the roles of Adam and Eve in Genesis, the concept of submission and authority in the New Testament, and the theological implications of the Trinity's perichoresis. Participants debate whether submission in marriage and ministry is hierarchical or mutual, and whether the biblical text supports equality or distinct roles for men and women. The conversation also touches on the cultural and historical context of the Pater Familia and its contrast with divine intent. | |
| | | | |
www.brandonstaggs.com
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The text presents a critical view of modern Christian movements, particularly the Emergent Church and Rick Warren's teachings, which are seen as leading back to mysticism and New Age ideas. It contrasts these with the Reformation's goals of returning to biblical truth and warns against the dangers of religious tolerance and apostasy. The discussion includes debates over Bible translations, the role of the KJV, and the importance of sticking to apostolic teachings. Many commenters share personal experiences of leaving churches due to doctrinal issues and express hope for a return to solid biblical foundations. | |
| | | | |
itself.blog
|
|
| | | This is a guest post by Joel Kuhlin, doctoral student at the Centre for Theology and Religious Studies, Lund University. The present response attempts to think with, rather than about, certain key-aspects of Thomas Lynch'sApocalyptic Political Theology, from the perspective of a philologist. From a philological appreciation ofApocalyptic Political Theology, instead of a purely philosophical... | ||
