Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
blogs.dickinson.edu | ||
| | | | |
www.greaterwrong.com
|
|
| | | | | A literal drowning child puts a limit on your commitment. Save this child, and your duty is discharged. When we apply this moral intuition to all the other issues in the world, our individual obligation suddenly becomes all-consuming. Furthermore, a literal drowning child is an accident. It represents a drastic exception to the normal outcomes of your society. Your saving action is plugging a hole in a basically sound system. Do our moral intuitions stem from a consequentialist goal to save all lives that can be saved? Or do they stem from an obligation to maintain a healthy, caring, and more-or-less self-sufficient society? | |
| | | | |
www.classicalvalues.com
|
|
| | | | | Classical Values | |
| | | | |
www.unemployednegativity.com
|
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
johnmuirlaws.com
|
|
| | | Join me as I visit the University of Oklahoma Jeannie Rainbolt College of Education to discuss journaling and science. | ||
