Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
fossa.com | ||
| | | | |
drewdevault.com
|
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
flameeyes.blog
|
|
| | | | | Preamble: this is an intentionally incendiary post, you could even define it as trolling. I have been thinking whether to publish this for a while, as it is on the border of being the type of unkind post I wouldn't want to be associated with. But I decided to post this for two reasons: the... | |
| | | | |
blog.jak-linux.org
|
|
| | | | | Today, I want to present you some things I have asked myself and some ideas about them. You should not expect the information to be correct. Therefore, if you find mistakes, please leave a comment. Copyright statements / Comments MIT license: The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. - If you had a python module released under the MIT license, and this is in the comment of the module and you somehow ship only pyc or pyo files, you would be violating the license by not including the copyright notice, because these files do not contain the modules. This is also true for many other licenses, but this seems to be the best example. | |
| | | | |
www.unsungnovelty.org
|
|
| | | [AI summary] The user has written a comprehensive blog post discussing their personal experiences and recommendations regarding Linux distributions, particularly Arch Linux and Linux Mint, as well as other alternatives like Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora, and OpenSUSE. They also mention their growing interest in BSD systems such as FreeBSD, OpenBSD, DragonflyBSD, and NetBSD, and touch upon the use of Nix package manager. The post includes debunking myths about Linux, rolling release distributions, and hardware compatibility. The user concludes by recommending Arch and Linux Mint for personal computing and expresses a future interest in exploring BSD systems. | ||
