Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
www.layer9.org | ||
| | | | |
tashian.com
|
|
| | | | | The story of a major hash table vulnerability, and how it took a decade to uncover and resolve. | |
| | | | |
attractivechaos.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | TL;DR: With linear probing, we can delete elements from an open addressing hash table without tombstones. Here are the C and the C++ implementations. Introduction When implementing a hash table based on open addressing, we usually set a tombstone for each deleted element, which indicates a bucket used to have an element. These tombstones maintain... | |
| | | | |
algorithmsoup.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | When people talk about "space-efficient hash tables'', they are usually talking about the following type of guarantee: If we are storing $latex n$ keys, each of which are $latex w$ bits, then the total space usage should be $latex (1 + \epsilon)wn$ bits for some small $latex \epsilon$. But, what if I told you we... | |
| | | | |
verdagon.dev
|
|
| | | |||
