Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
www.eruditorumpress.com | ||
| | | | |
fakegeekboy.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | OK, first off a bit of housekeeping about Season/Series numbering. The first full Ncuti Gatwa-fronted season of Doctor Who is being marketed as "Season One" (the word I hear is that Disney insisted on this), which breaks what had previously been a nice naming convention adopted by the BBC where "Seasons" referred to classic Who,... | |
| | | | |
tombrevoort.com
|
|
| | | | | The revival series of DOCTOR WHO has been around now for close to two decades, and has produced any number of wonderful and thrilling episodes. It improves upon the formula of the original 1963-1989 series (while studiously maintaining a tangible connection with it) by putting its greatest emphasis on emotionalism. DOCTOR WHO, the modern version,... | |
| | | | |
mycomicrelief.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | This piece is intimidating to write. At 172 episodes, Tom Baker has played the Doctor longer than any other actor (a record I can't imagine anyone breaking). The Fourth Doctor stars in ~ 25% of all Classic Doctor Who! And at 872 episodes (at the time of this writing), he accounts for ~ 20% of... | |
| | | | |
them0vieblog.com
|
|
| | | [AI summary] The user provided a lengthy and complex discussion about the episode 'The Timeless Child' from Doctor Who, involving multiple comments, debates, and theories. The core of the discussion revolves around the revelation that the Time Lords' ability to regenerate is linked to the Doctor's DNA, which has sparked debates about continuity, character development, and the implications for the show's lore. The user is seeking a concise summary or analysis of the main points and arguments presented in the discussion, possibly to better understand the context or to formulate a response. | ||
