Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
www.mattblaze.org | ||
| | | | |
www.schneier.com
|
|
| | | | | Interesting analysis: An Internet Voting System Fatally Flawed in Creative New Ways. Abstract: The recently published "MERGE" protocol is designed to be used in the prototype CAC-vote system. The voting kiosk and protocol transmit votes over the internet and then transmit voter-verifiable paper ballots through the mail. In the MERGE protocol, the votes transmitted over the internet are used to tabulate the results and determine the winners, but audits and recounts use the paper ballots that arrive in time. The enunciated motivation for the protocol is to allow (electronic) votes from overseas military voters to be included in preliminary results before a (paper) ballot is received from the voter. MERGE contains interesting ideas that are not inherently unsou... | |
| | | | |
rcoh.me
|
|
| | | | | Given the level of distrust in election systems in recent years, I became curious about verifiable voting systems - systems in which you can ensure that your vote was really counted, and counted correctly. Systems in which everyone (or at least interested parties) can verify that election results precisely reflect the votes cast. The verifiable voting system I'll describe is pretty close to "regular" voting for voters. They don't need to care the election is e2e verified, they just need to vote like normal. | |
| | | | |
benlog.com
|
|
| | | | | It's voting season! Which means everyone is asking questions like: wait, why can't I vote online? how hard can voting really be? shouldn't this all be open-source? isn't it just as easy to hack paper voting as electronic voting? is Russia hacking our voting machines? why do we even need voting machines when other countries... | |
| | | | |
opam.ocaml.org
|
|
| | | The homepage of opam, a package manager for OCaml | ||
