Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
blog.computationalcomplexity.org | ||
| | | | |
arunmani.in
|
|
| | | | | My journey in publishing a book using GNU Emacs and OrgMode. | |
| | | | |
mappingignorance.org
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The discussion revolves around the productivity of Word and LaTeX for document creation, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses. Word is praised for its ease of use, collaboration features, and handling of long texts, while LaTeX excels in mathematical typesetting, automation of references, and producing high-quality documents. The debate includes user experiences, with some advocating for Word's versatility and others favoring LaTeX for complex academic work. The conclusion suggests that the choice depends on the task's complexity and collaboration needs. | |
| | | | |
devyn.ca
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] A review comparing the LaTeX editing experiences of org-mode and TeXstudio, highlighting their strengths and use cases for document creation. | |
| | | | |
brandonrozek.com
|
|
| | | I often struggle with deciding how much content to put on my slides. Personally, I feel that my slides should be self-contained so that others can review them afterwards. This was especially true when I held recitations as a TA. What if instead of putting all the content into one slide, we can have a corresponding notes document? Crazy enough, Beamer comes to the rescue! Within a frame in beamer, we can add a \note[item]{X} call, and the contents of X will appear in a bullet point within a corresponding ... | ||
