Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
bpa-pathology.com | ||
| | | | |
lemire.me
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The article discusses the limitations of peer review in science, using historical and contemporary examples to argue that it is not the gold standard. It highlights cases where peer review may suppress innovative or controversial ideas, such to the lab origin of SARS-CoV-2. The piece critiques the suppression of dissenting views and the role of funding and institutional pressures in shaping scientific discourse. It concludes that science should be open and progressive, with peer review being a tool rather than a gatekeeping mechanism. | |
| | | | |
www.newsmagazine.org
|
|
| | | | | The scientist who invented the PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) test kit was Kary B. Mullis. This technology is what they use today to test for COVID19, said to be the cause of a disease which the health authorities such as the World Health Organizations (WHO) vaguely and inconsistently defined or identified. Mullis is among the [...] | |
| | | | |
theconversation.com
|
|
| | | | | If expert advice on the pandemic turns out to be wrong, it will have dire consequences for how reliable scientific evidence is treated in other policy areas, such as climate change. | |
| | | | |
vaxopedia.org
|
|
| | | Omicron has quickly become the dominate COVID strain in the United States. | ||
