Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
jaydaigle.net | ||
| | | | |
fharrell.com
|
|
| | | | | This is the story of what influenced me to become a Bayesian statistician after being trained as a classical frequentist statistician, and practicing only that mode of statistics for many years. | |
| | | | |
errorstatistics.com
|
|
| | | | | Has the "abandon significance" movement in statistics trickled down into philosophy of science? A little bit. Nowadays (since the late 1990's [i]), probabilistic inference and confirmation enter in philosophy by way of fields dubbed formal epistemology and Bayesian epistemology. These fields, as I see them, are essentially ways to do analytic epistemology using probability. Given... | |
| | | | |
www.statsblogs.com
|
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
mkatkov.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | For probability space $latex (\Omega, \mathcal{F}, \mathbb{P})$ with $latex A \in \mathcal{F}$ the indicator random variable $latex {\bf 1}_A : \Omega \rightarrow \mathbb{R} = \left\{ \begin{array}{cc} 1, & \omega \in A \\ 0, & \omega \notin A \end{array} \right.$ Than expected value of the indicator variable is the probability of the event $latex \omega \in... | ||
