/explore

Click through on any links that interest you or select the planets on the right to continue exploring the Outer Web.
You are here

 asapbio.org
FAQ on publishing peer review ASAPbio
| | scientistseessquirrel.wordpress.com
Please don't "make science transparent" by publishing your reviews | Scientist Sees Squirrel
1.8 parsecs away

Travel
| | Image: "Transparency", CC BY-SA HonestReporting.com, flickr/freepress Note: This is a modestly revised version of my original post, which was not written very clearly. (Yes, I'm aware of the irony.) It was easy, reading the original version, to think I was primarily objecting to journals publishing peer reviews. I'm ambivalent about that (and my arguments below...
| | f1000research.com
Guidelines For Article Reviewers | F1000Research
3.0 parsecs away

Travel
| | Read about the F1000Research peer review model and understand what is required as a reviewer.
| | www.mja.com.au
Reviewing for the MJA | The Medical Journal of Australia
4.0 parsecs away

Travel
| | [AI summary] This article details the peer review process for the Medical Journal of Australia, outlining guidelines, criteria, and expectations for reviewers to ensure high-quality research publication.
| | osc.centerforopenscience.org
Open Science Collaboration Blog ยท A publishing sting, but what was stung?
12.3 parsecs away

Travel
| [AI summary] An article discusses the issues with peer-reviewed Open Access journals, citing John Bohannon's sting operation and the controversy surrounding its methodology and conclusions.