Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
asapbio.org | ||
| | | | |
blog.scienceopen.com
|
|
| | | | | One main aspect of open peer review is that referee reports are made publicly available after the peer review process. The theory underlying this is that peer review becomes a supportive and collaborative process, viewed more as an ongoing dialogue between groups of scientists to progressively asses the quality of research. Furthermore, it opens up [...] | |
| | | | |
www.mja.com.au
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The article explains the peer review process for the Medical Journal of Australia, detailing the role of reviewers, the criteria for evaluating manuscripts, and guidelines for conducting constructive reviews. | |
| | | | |
peerj.com
|
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
www.fharrell.com
|
|
| | | This is the story of what influenced me to become a Bayesian statistician after being trained as a classical frequentist statistician, and practicing only that mode of statistics for many years. | ||
