Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
blog.kagi.com | ||
| | | | |
formularsumo.co.uk
|
|
| | | | | Apple & Google at the EU DMA compliance workshops, June 2025. | |
| | | | |
mjtsai.com
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] A federal judge ruled that Google violated US antitrust law by maintaining a monopoly in the search and advertising markets through practices like paying companies to be the default search engine. The ruling, led by Judge Amit Mehta, highlights how these payments incentivize companies like Apple to avoid competing with Google, thus preserving Google's dominance. The case now moves to determining remedies, with potential changes to the search market and antitrust enforcement. | |
| | | | |
crazystupidtech.com
|
|
| | | | | The lawsuits aren't about protecting competition in search and online display ads but about keeping Google from leveraging its monopoly in AI. | |
| | | | |
rooney.law
|
|
| | | The first antitrust decision of the modern-day internet era against a technology giant. In a landmark ruling, US District Judge Amit Mehta (an apt surname for this case) decided that Google illegally exploited its search engine market dominance to stifle competition. Judge Mehta said Google was a "monopolist" who "acted as one to maintain its | ||
