/explore

Click through on any links that interest you or select the planets on the right to continue exploring the Outer Web.
You are here

 msfjarvis.dev
Dagger the easy way - Part 2 | Harsh Shandilya
| | sookocheff.com
Inversion of Control, Dependency Injection, and the Spring IoC Container | Kevin Sookocheff
5.7 parsecs away

Travel
| | Inversion of Control (IoC), also known as Dependency Injection (DI), allows an object to define their dependencies as constructor arguments (strictly speaking, you can set these dependencies as properties, but the examples I will use today are constructor-based). This is the inverse of the object itself controlling the instantiation or location of its dependencies, hence the name Inversion of Control. Let's look at an example from Stackoverflow using a text editor with a spell checking component:
| | arturdryomov.dev
A Dagger to Remember
2.4 parsecs away

Travel
| | Replacing Dagger with Kotlin. Wait, what?
| | ryanharter.com
Simple APIs are elegant APIs :: Ryan Harter
2.7 parsecs away

Travel
| | I recently gave a presentation about how Dagger works under the hood, and I was once again struck by the elegance of the javax.inject.Provider interface. The interface is so simple it almost seems useless, but it's also incredibly flexible, and forms the basis of much of the code generated by Dagger. Like many dependency injection frameworks for JVM languages, Dagger uses and builds on the standard set of annotations for injectable classes defined in JSR-330 and provided in the javax.
| | smallcultfollowing.com
Async trait send bounds, part 1: intro ยท baby steps
22.0 parsecs away

Travel
| [AI summary] A developer explains the technical challenges of ensuring async trait functions return Send futures in Rust and proposes a syntax solution where function callers specify send requirements rather than enforcing them globally in the trait definition.