/explore
|
You are here 
|
robert.accettura.com | ||
| | | | |
devnonsense.com
KubeCon this year featured a panel discussion of IPv6 adoption. One of the panelists mentioned in passing that many organizations are unprepared for the security implications IPv6. With IPv4, most addresses were hidden by NAT; with IPv6, addresses are publicly routable. Firewalls can block external traffic, but might not be configured correctly. So I did an experiment on my home network. Would enabling IPv6 expose my devices on the public internet? |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
lwn.net
|
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
blog.cyphermox.net
Dnsmasq currently only listens on 127.0.0.1; that's done on purpose. If the only nameserver you have is 127.0.0.1, both IPv4 and IPv6 querie... |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
anarc.at
|
|
| | | |||
