/explore
|
You are here 
|
www.lesswrong.com | ||
| | | | |
www.alignmentforum.org
This piece gives an overview of the alignment problem and makes the case for AI alignment research. It is crafted both to be broadly accessible to th... |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
www.greaterwrong.com
This is a new introduction to AI as an extinction threat, previously posted to the MIRI website in February alongside a summary. It was written independently of Eliezer and Nate's forthcoming book, If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies, and isn't a sneak peak of the book. Since the book is long and costs money, we expect this to be a valuable resource in its own right even after the book comes out next month.[1] The stated goal of the world's leading AI companies is to build AI that is general enough to do anything a human can do, from solving hard problems in theoretical physics to deftly navigating social environments. Recent machine learning progress seems to have brought this goal within reach. At this point, we would be uncomfortable ruling out the possibi... |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
www.greaterwrong.com
Philosopher David Chalmers asked: [I]s there a canonical source for "the argument for AGI ruin" somewhere, preferably laid out as an explicit argument with premises and a conclusion? Unsurprisingly, the actual reason people expect AGI ruin isn't a crisp deductive argument; it's a probabilistic update based on many lines of evidence. The specific observations and heuristics that carried the most weight for someone will vary for each individual, and can be hard to accurately draw out. |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
mjtsai.com
|
|
| | | |||
