/explore
|
You are here 
|
critterscrap.blogspot.com | ||
| | | | |
mikeb302000.blogspot.com
|
|
| | | | | a blog about guns, gun control, liberal politics, conservatism, obama, bloomberg, la pierre, great music, criminals and much more | |
| | | | |
www.renegademothering.com
|
|
| | | | | Let's get something really fucking clear right now: Our country is gaslighting us. At this point, without willful ignorance or staunch denial or some special cocktail of both, there is no way to dodge the reality of our country. Whatever hope any of us had (spoiler alert I had none) that Trump "wouldn't be that bad" has crashed by now, and we are left with detention centers for children ripped from their parents' arms, alongside a mural of our dictator. Wait. We aren't supposed to have a dictator. When our President refers to a murderous dictator running a totalitarian state | |
| | | | |
www.reclaimthefight.com
|
|
| | | | | In the aftermath of the election when the big loser of the popular vote is going to the White House, leaving the rest of the world to whom ... | |
| | | | |
www.law.cornell.edu
|
|
| | | [AI summary] The text discusses the legal and historical context surrounding campaign finance regulations, particularly focusing on the regulation of corporate and union political speech. It highlights key Supreme Court cases such as Buckley v. Valeo, Citizens United v. FEC, and McConnell v. FEC, which have shaped the understanding of corporate expenditures in elections. The text emphasizes the distinction between direct contributions and independent expenditures, the role of PACs, and the rationale behind restrictions on corporate spending to prevent corruption and the appearance thereof. It also references the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) and the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA), noting how they have been upheld by the Court as legitimate exer... | ||
