/explore
|
You are here 
|
www.lesswrong.com | ||
| | | | |
www.greaterwrong.com
|
|
| | | | | A common thing in academia is to write 'review articles' that attempt to summarize a whole field quickly, allowing researchers to see what's out there (while referring them to the actual articles for all of the details). This is my attempt to do something similar for the 2020 Review, focusing on posts that had sufficiently many votes (as all nominated posts was a few too many). I ended up clustering the posts into seven categories: rationality, gears, economics, history, current events, communication, and alignment. | |
| | | | |
www.alignmentforum.org
|
|
| | | | | This piece gives an overview of the alignment problem and makes the case for AI alignment research. It is crafted both to be broadly accessible to th... | |
| | | | |
joecarlsmith.com
|
|
| | | | | Introduction to an essay series about paths to safe, useful superintelligence. | |
| | | | |
www.greaterwrong.com
|
|
| | | Anthropic is untrustworthy. This post provides arguments, asks questions, and documents some examples of Anthropic's leadership being misleading and deceptive, holding contradictory positions that consistently shift in OpenAI's direction, lobbying to kill and water down regulation so helpful that employees of all major AI companies speak out to support it, and violating the fundamental promise the company was founded on. It also shares a few previously unreported details on Anthropic leadership's promises and efforts.[1] | ||
