/explore
|
You are here 
|
blog.quaddmg.com | ||
| | | | |
chadaustin.me
This may be the only time I weigh in on the static vs. dynamic typing discussion. Each side has its extreme proponents, and people differ in their ability and desire to work in systems with implicit invariants. Many years ago, back when Java and C++ were the Mainstream Languages and Python was the shiny new up-and-comer, I read Bruce Eckel's arguments in support of dynamically typed languages, and some of the nonobvious (at the time) ways you can get more done at higher quality in a more flexible languag... |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
nurkiewicz.com
When choosing or learning a new programming language, type system should be your first question. How strict is that language when types don't really match? Will there be a conservative, slow and annoying compiler? Or maybe a fast feedback loop, often resulting in crashes at runtime? And also, is the language runtime trusting you know what you are doing, even if you don't? Or maybe it's babysitting you, making it hard to write fast, low-level code? Believe it or not, I just described static, dynamic, weak and strong typing. |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
blog.jooq.org
Sometimes there are these moments of truth. They happen completely unexpectedly, such as when I read this tweet: https://twitter.com/whileydave/status/536422407297171457 David is the author of the lesser-known but not at all lesser-interesting Whiley programming language, a language that has a lot of static type checking built in it. One of the most interesting features of the... |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
ponyfoo.com
[AI summary] This technical article explains the async/await feature in JavaScript, detailing its relationship with Promises and generators, and provides code examples demonstrating how to handle asynchronous operations, concurrent tasks, and errors. |
|
| | | |||
