Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
historyforatheists.com | ||
| | | | |
themultidisciplinarian.com
|
|
| | | | | NASA reports that ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that human-caused climate change is happening. As with earlier posts on popular miscarriages of science, I look at climate science through the lens of the 20th century historians of science and philosophers of science and conclude that climate science is epistemically thin. To elaborate a bit,... | |
| | | | |
www.quackometer.net
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The discussion centers around the efficacy and historical context of homeopathy, particularly in relation to Charles Darwin's health. Critics argue that the evidence for homeopathy's effectiveness is anecdotal and lacks scientific validation, while proponents highlight historical cases like Darwin's supposed recovery as proof of its efficacy. The debate touches on issues of medical science, anecdotal evidence, and the reliability of historical diagnoses. The conversation also includes critiques of the peer-review process and the dissemination of information on alternative medicine. | |
| | | | |
acoup.blog
|
|
| | | | | Hey folks, Fireside this week! As I noted a couple of weeks ago, things are probably going to get more than a little fireside-y over the next few weeks, simply because of the start of the semester - and a semester in which I am undertaking a set of entire new preps (that is, teaching... | |
| | | | |
www.drroyspencer.com
|
|
| | | |||
