/explore
|
You are here 
|
pluralistic.net | ||
| | | | |
blog.cr.yp.to
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The text discusses the legal and ethical implications of government attempts to control encryption and surveillance technologies, drawing parallels between software and traditional forms of communication like books and papers. It highlights historical efforts by the FBI and NSA to restrict strong encryption, the role of the First Amendment in protecting free speech, and the Apple-FBI case as a modern example of these tensions. The text argues that software should be treated as speech under the First Amendment and criticizes the government's attempts to suppress encryption for surveillance purposes. | |
| | | | |
www.wired.com
|
|
| | | | | Atkinson's gleeful brilliance helped people draw on computer screens and access information via links. | |
| | | | |
theplatformlaw.blog
|
|
| | | | | Yesterday, Apple made an important announcement regarding changes to iOS, Safari, and the App Store in the European Union in response to the Digital Markets Act ("DMA"). This announcement covers a lot of ground and should be read in parallel with a number of accompanying documents. In this blog post, I discuss my first (and ... Continue reading When Apple takes the European Commission for fools: An initial overview of Apple's new terms and conditions for iOS app distribution in the EU | |
| | | | |
dissidentvoice.org
|
|
| | | Faramarz Farbod: You have taught at Princeton University for four decades; you were the UN Special Rapporteur for Human Rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territories in Israel (2008-2014); and you are the author of numerous books about global issues and international law. In preparation for this conversation, I have been reading your autobiography, Public Intellectual: | ||
