Explore >> Select a destination


You are here

www.edouardstenger.com
| | nbmediacoop.org
8.5 parsecs away

Travel
| | What is the best way for utilities to delay the transition from fossil fuels? Propose to build nuclear reactors. Electricity
| | energytransition.org
9.2 parsecs away

Travel
| | Peatlands[1] account for 3% of the world's land surface. As long as they are intact, they store large quantities of carbon dioxide (CO?), one of the greenhouse...
| | www.keithhennessey.com
8.3 parsecs away

Travel
| | I wrote last Friday about the China/India hole in the American climate strategy: America appears to lack a high-probability strategy for how to get China, India, and Russia to agree to self-impose a significant positive carbon price. The Administration and its Congressional allies are trying to impose a significant carbon price in the U.S. through [...] The post The Smoot-Krugman carbon import tariff appeared first on Keith Hennessey.
| | www.manhattancontrarian.com
94.4 parsecs away

Travel
| * At this site, when I have written about countries and states seeking to be among the leaders in eliminating fossil fuels from their electricity supply, I have generally focused on the larger jurisdictions, like Germany and the UK in Europe, and California and New York in the U.S. * But there is one much smaller country that puts all of those bigger ones to shame: Denmark. * With a population of only about 6 million, Denmark has pushed the "renewable" electricity generation thing well beyond what others have been able to accomplish. According to its official statistics, in 2024 Denmark got some 79.5% of its electricity from what it calls "low carbon" sources. The large majority of that came from wind and solar, with only a minimal contribution from nuclear. As to nuclear, Denmark had in fact mandated phasing it out, by a law passed back in 2003. * So then, does it seem like, with just a final little push, Denmark can go over the top and reach the long-sought goal of 100% of generation from "renewables"?