/explore
|
You are here 
|
www.lesswrong.com | ||
| | | | |
www.biointelligence-explosion.com
|
|
| | | | | Do biological minds have a future? | |
| | | | |
www.alignmentforum.org
|
|
| | | | | This piece gives an overview of the alignment problem and makes the case for AI alignment research. It is crafted both to be broadly accessible to th... | |
| | | | |
www.greaterwrong.com
|
|
| | | | | This is a new introduction to AI as an extinction threat, previously posted to the MIRI website in February alongside a summary. It was written independently of Eliezer and Nate's forthcoming book, If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies, and isn't a sneak peak of the book. Since the book is long and costs money, we expect this to be a valuable resource in its own right even after the book comes out next month.[1] The stated goal of the world's leading AI companies is to build AI that is general enough to do anything a human can do, from solving hard problems in theoretical physics to deftly navigating social environments. Recent machine learning progress seems to have brought this goal within reach. At this point, we would be uncomfortable ruling out the possibi... | |
| | | | |
www.greaterwrong.com
|
|
| | | (Audio version, read by the author, here, or search for "Joe Carlsmith Audio" on your podcast app.)Last Friday was my last day at Open Philanthropy. I'll be starting a new role at Anthropic in mid-November, helping with the design of Claude's character/constitution/spec. This post reflects on my time at Open Philanthropy, and it goes into more detail about my perspective and intentions with respect to Anthropic - including some of my takes on AI-safety-focused people working at frontier AI companies. | ||
