Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
mattiheino.com | ||
| | | | |
talyarkoni.org
|
|
| | | | | Is there a valid (i.e., non-historical) reason why personality psychology and social psychology are so often lumped together as one branch of psychology? There are PSP journals, PSP conferences, PS... | |
| | | | |
jaydaigle.net
|
|
| | | | | This is the second-part of a three-part series on hypothesis testing. Today we'll look at the way we do hypothesis testing in practice, and how it tends to fail. Modern researchers use hypothesis testing as a tool to develop knowledge, but it's really a tool for making decisions, and so it encourages us to draw strong conclusions from weak evidence. It also encourages us to view studies that don't reject the null hypothesis as failures, which leads even honest and dedicated researchers to do shoddy resea... | |
| | | | |
www.wiringthebrain.com
|
|
| | | | | In Part 1 of this series, I explored the different philosophical premises that Robert Sapolsky and I bring to the question of free will, in... | |
| | | | |
phil-stat-wars.com
|
|
| | | II. (May 28):N-P and FisherianTests, Severe Testing: How to avoid fallacies of tests Reading: SIST: Excursion 3 Tour I (focus on pages up to p. 152):3.1,3.2,3.3 Recommended:Excursion 2 Tour II pp. 92-100 (Sections 2.4-2.7) Optional: I will (try to) answer questions on demarcation of science, induction, falsification, Popper from Excursion 2 Tour II (Section 2.3)... | ||
