Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
linux-user.gr | ||
| | | | |
blog.linuxmint.com
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The user has provided a collection of comments and discussions from various users regarding Linux Mint. The key points of discussion include: 1) Concerns about Canonical's influence, particularly regarding Snap package management and its potential monopolistic tendencies. 2) Suggestions to transition Linux Mint to be based on Debian instead of Ubuntu to maintain independence and avoid Canonical's control. 3) Discussions around the removal of 32-bit support, with some users expressing concerns about its impact on older hardware and specific use cases like supporting pensioners with outdated computers. 4) Other topics include user feedback on the UI/UX, the need for more tutorials and resources in French, and the availability of certain applicatio... | |
| | | | |
www.omgubuntu.co.uk
|
|
| | | | | Canonical's kernel team has confirmed that Ubuntu 25.10 will run on the Linux 6.17 kernel - expected, following the distro maker's kernel cadence change. | |
| | | | |
www.webupd8.org
|
|
| | | | | New KDE Connect Indicator Ubuntu / Linux Mint PPA ~ Ubuntu / Linux blog | |
| | | | |
nathanchance.dev
|
|
| | | As a Linux kernel developer, I will often need to build and boot new kernels to hunt down issues or test new functionality for regressions. While it is possible to manually install these kernels on machines, it is easiest to use the distribution's package manager, as the kernel does not need to be built on the machine it is being installed on. With .deb and .rpm-based systems, it is easy to build a kernel package within the kernel source itself, using the bindeb-pkg and binrpm-pkg targets respectively. However, for Arch Linux, my distribution of choice, that is not so simple. Furthermore, when doing certain types of development, such as bisecting an issue, it is more convenient to do all the building in an actual source tree, rather than one that is managed ... | ||
