Outer Web | Explore

Explore >> Select a destination

You are here		www.theexclusive.org Making unblinding manageable: Towards reconciling prepublication and double-blind review \| The Exclusive Or
\|	\|	jacobbuckman.com On Peer Review	2.5 parsecs away Travel
\|	\|	In light of the recent discussions on the *ACL reviewing process on Twitter, I want to share some thoughts. Do We Need Peer Review? Specifically, do we need double-blind peer review of the sort that conferences provide? I'm in full agreement with Ryan that it is an essential service for...	2.5 parsecs away Travel
\|	\|	togelius.blogspot.com Togelius: Against "selective" conferences	3.6 parsecs away Travel
\|	\|	Computer science differs from most other academic fields in that conference papers are counted as real, citable publications. While journals...	3.6 parsecs away Travel
\|	\|	windowsontheory.org On double blind reviews in theory conferences Windows On Theory	4.3 parsecs away Travel
\|	\|	Michael Mitzenmacher pointsto two posts ofSuresh Venkatasubramanian on the issue of so called "double blind reviews" (i.e., anonymous submissions) in theory conferences. In short, both Michael and Suresh think they are a good idea. I agree with much of their motivations, but, based on my experience in both non-blinded (e.g., STOC/FOCS) and blinded (e.g., CRYPTO)	4.3 parsecs away Travel
\|	\|	aaronsadventures.blogspot.com Adventures in Computation: FORC 2021 Call for Papers	13.7 parsecs away Travel
\|		Reminder to anyone who has forgotten about FORC 2021 --- its a very nice venue --- and also a nice place to highlight recent work that is p...	13.7 parsecs away Travel