/explore
|
You are here 
|
www.dorfonlaw.org | ||
| | | | |
www.scotusblog.com
The Supreme Court on Thursday threw out a ruling by a federal district court holding that a congressional district on the South Carolina coast was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander - that is, it sorted voters based primarily on their race. In an opinion by Justice Samuel Alito, the justices cle |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
www.manhattancontrarian.com
If you ever wonder what kind of rulings we might get if the progressive Democrats some day achieve full control of the U.S. Supreme Court, you can try looking to some of the state Supreme Courts that come under Democrat control. One of my favorites is the Supreme Court of North Carolina. North Carolina is a purple state, and generally tending more to red than blue. But the justices of its state Supreme Court are elected. In 2016, in a nominally "non-partisan" election, the Democrats took control of the Court by a narrow 4-3 majority. Meanwhile both houses of the state legislature have been controlled by Republicans since 2011. The Governor has been a Democrat since 2016. |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
amylhowe.com
The Supreme Court on Thursday threw out a ruling by a federal district court holding that a congressional district on the South Carolina coast was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander - that is, it sorted voters based primarily on their race. In an opinion by Justice Samuel Alito, the justices cleared the way for the state... Read More |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
www.nytimes.com
Here's a look at how Louisiana, Alabama and Tennessee broke up majority-Black districts after the Supreme Court weakened the Voting Rights Act. |
|
| | | |||
