|
You are here |
specbranch.com | ||
| | | | |
www.johndcook.com
|
|
| | | | | Random number generator test services. We test RNGs using the standard test suites: PractRand, TestU01 (BigCrush), DIEHARD(ER), NIST SP 800-22. | |
| | | | |
healeycodes.com
|
|
| | | | | Building a replacement for JavaScript's random number generator. | |
| | | | |
www.thomas-huehn.com
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The article discusses the use of /dev/random and /dev/urandom in Linux systems for generating random numbers. It highlights that /dev/urandom is generally preferred over /dev/random due to its non-blocking nature and sufficient cryptographic security. The article also addresses misconceptions in the man pages and emphasizes that /dev/urandom is safe for most applications, including cryptographic uses, as long as the initial seeding is done properly. It mentions that while /dev/random is considered a legacy interface, it's not always necessary, and modern Linux distributions and syscalls like getrandom(2) provide better alternatives. | |
| | | | |
allsoftwaresucks.blogspot.com
|
|
| | | Reverse-engineering Samsung S10 TEEGRIS TrustZone OS It's been a while since my last post, huh? Even though I have quite a lot of stuff I... | ||