Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
schachtmanlaw.com | ||
| | | | |
summerseminarphilstat.com
|
|
| | | | | A key recognition among those who write on the statistical crisis in science is that the pressure to publish attention-getting articles can incentivize researchers to produce eye-catching but inadequately scrutinized claims. We may see much the same sensationalism in broadcasting metastatistical research, especially if it takes the form of scapegoating or banning statistical significance. A... | |
| | | | |
errorstatistics.com
|
|
| | | | | When it comes to the statistics wars, leaders of rival tribes sometimes sound as if they believed "les stats, c'est moi". [1]. So, rather than say they would like to supplement some well-known tenets (e.g., "a statistically significant effect may not be substantively important") with a new rule that advances their particular preferred language or... | |
| | | | |
errorstatistics.com
|
|
| | | | | Have you noticed that some of the harshest criticisms of frequentist error-statistical methods these days rest on methods and grounds that the critics themselves purport to reject? Is there a whiff of inconsistency in proclaiming an "anti-hypothesis-testing stance" while in the same breath extolling the uses of statistical significance tests and p-values in mounting criticisms... | |
| | | | |
jenniferjackson.org
|
|
| | | |||
