Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
tomstu.art | ||
| | | | |
www.honeybadger.io
|
|
| | | | | Ruby's flexibility has always been both its greatest strength and its greatest weakness. You can write amazingly expressive programs. You can also slip and break them in amazingly expressive ways. RBS is a new type an... | |
| | | | |
blog.ploeh.dk
|
|
| | | | | Static typing doesn't have to involve much ceremony. | |
| | | | |
existentialtype.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | While reviewing some of the comments on my post about parallelism and concurrency, I noticed that the great fallacy about dynamic and static languages continues to hold people in its thrall. So, in the same "everything you know is wrong" spirit, let me try to set this straight: a dynamic language is a straightjacketed static | |
| | | | |
gavinhoward.com
|
|
| | | There are 8 questions that must be answered to design a good type system. In this post, I attempt to do just that. | ||
