Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
www.emilygorcenski.com | ||
| | | | |
www.legalfeminist.org.uk
|
|
| | | | | The decision of the High Court in Bell v & anor v The Tavistock & Portman NHS Foundation Trust & ors [2020] EWHC 3274 (Admin) has given rise to both jubilation and outrage. Detransitioners and their gender critical allies feel vindicated by judicial recognition that treatment of children with puberty blockers is experimental and dangerous; | |
| | | | |
www.standingforfreedom.com
|
|
| | | | | The horrifying truth is these medical associations already know that the push to socially and medically "affirm" a child as the opposite sex is harmful. There is no way they couldn't know. So what this declaration is fighting isn't ignorance but something much more sinister. Medical associations and doctors have sent a declaration to major U.S. medical associations demanding that they follow evidence and the lead of European countries and cease promoting transgender surgeries and other gender affirmation... | |
| | | | |
www.ministryoftruth.me.uk
|
|
| | | | | I want to return to the High Court judgment in Bell v Tavistock and take a closer look at one of the more contentious issues that was put before the court, this being the question of the exact purp... | |
| | | | |
publiclawforeveryone.com
|
|
| | | I have just finished work on abook chapter entitled "The Principle of Parliamentary Sovereignty in Legal, Constitutional and Political Perspective", the abstract for which is as follows: Parliamentary sovereignty has long been regarded - by most, at least - as an axiomatic feature of the United Kingdom's constitutional arrangements. The orthodox view holds that the... | ||
