Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
wattsupwiththat.com | ||
| | | | |
arctic-news.blogspot.com
|
|
| | | | | Blog edited by Sam Carana, with news on climate change and warming in the Arctic due to snow and ice loss and methane releases from the seafloor. | |
| | | | |
www.davidappell.com
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The history of climate change research shows that scientists have long recognized the potential impact of human activities on the climate. From the early 20th century, there were discussions about the greenhouse effect and its influence on global temperatures. Over time, as more data became available, the consensus among scientists grew that increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases, particularly carbon dioxide, are a significant factor in global warming. Key milestones include the 1958 discovery of the Keeling Curve, which demonstrated the steady rise in atmospheric CO2 levels, and the 1970s and 1980s when the scientific community began to more clearly understand the implications of these changes. By the late 20th century, the evidence supp... | |
| | | | |
judithcurry.com
|
|
| | | | | James Hansen's latest paper "Global warming in the pipeline" (Hansen et al. (2023)) has already been heavily criticized in a lengthy comment by Michael Mann, author of the original IPCC 'hockey stick'. However Mann does not deal with Hansen's surprisingly high (4.8°C) new estimate of equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS)[1]. This ECS estimate is 60% above... | |
| | | | |
andymaypetrophysicist.com
|
|
| | | Opinion by Andy May Al Gore wrote in the Huffington Post (August 28, 2014) that the need for "bold action" to curtail "old dirty sources of energy ... is obvious and urgent." The proper scientific response to an assertion like that is why? How can I test this idea? Science is not a belief, it... | ||
