Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
theoreticalecology.wordpress.com | ||
| | | | |
summerseminarphilstat.com
|
|
| | | | | A key recognition among those who write on the statistical crisis in science is that the pressure to publish attention-getting articles can incentivize researchers to produce eye-catching but inadequately scrutinized claims. We may see much the same sensationalism in broadcasting metastatistical research, especially if it takes the form of scapegoating or banning statistical significance. A... | |
| | | | |
easystats.github.io
|
|
| | | | | TLDR: BayestestR currently uses a 89% threshold by default for Credible Intervals (CI). Should we change that? If so, by what? Join the discussion here. Magical numbers, or conventional thresholds, have bad press in statistics, and there are many of them. For instance, .05 (for the p-value), or the 95% range for the Confidence Interval (CI). Indeed, why 95 and not 94 or 90? One of the issue that traditional confidence intervals are often being interpreted as a description of the uncertainty surrounding a parameter's value. | |
| | | | |
errorstatistics.com
|
|
| | | | | Some have asked me why I haven't blogged on the recent follow-up to the ASA Statement on P-Values and Statistical Significance (Wasserstein and Lazar 2016)-hereafter, ASA I. They're referring to the editorial by Wasserstein, R., Schirm, A. and Lazar, N. (2019)-hereafter, ASA II(note)-opening a special on-line issue of over 40 contributions responding to the call... | |
| | | | |
spritely.institute
|
|
| | | |||
