/explore
|
You are here 
|
www.greaterwrong.com | ||
| | | | |
www.lesswrong.com
|
|
| | | | | We founded Anthropic because we believe the impact of AI might be comparable to that of the industrial and scientific revolutions, but we aren't conf... | |
| | | | |
blog.computationalcomplexity.org
|
|
| | | | | I read through the new book If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies by Eliezer Yudkowsky and Nate Soares. "It" refers to Artificial Super Intell... | |
| | | | |
www.lesswrong.com
|
|
| | | | | Quintin Pope & Nora Belrose have a new"AI Optimists" website, along with a new essay "AI is easy to control", arguing that the risk of human extinct... | |
| | | | |
www.greaterwrong.com
|
|
| | | Paul Christiano and "MIRI" have disagreed on an important research question for a long time: should we focus research on aligning "messy" AGI (e.g. one found through gradient descent or brute force search) with human values, or on developing "principled" AGI (based on theories similar to Bayesian probability theory)? I'm going to present my current model of this disagreement and additional thoughts about it. I put "MIRI" in quotes because MIRI is an organization composed of people who have differing views. I'm going to use the term "MIRI view" to refer to some combination of the views of Eliezer, Benya, and Nate. I think these three researchers have quite similar views, such that it is appropriate in some contexts to attribute a view to all of them collectiv... | ||
