|
You are here |
henko.net | ||
| | | | |
mmhaskell.com
|
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
degoes.net
|
|
| | | | | Functional programming has a bit of jargon, but that doesn't have to stop you from understanding core concepts | |
| | | | |
noelwelsh.com
|
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
programmingmadecomplicated.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | There are these things that, depending on your definition, many or all programming languages use: 'types'. There's also a rich mathematical study of types in Type Theory which, along with related disciplines, has many connections to logic and proof. Why? Often, they take the form of explicit 'annotations' to program artefacts, big and small. For... | ||