/explore
|
You are here 
|
www.theguardian.com | ||
| | | | |
publiclawforeveryone.com
Earlier this week, I wrote in my review of recent developments that it is possible to identify a stream of jurisprudence that has emerged from the UK Supreme Court over the last year which places particular and renewed emphasis on the common law as a source of fundamental constitutional values and rights. I cited Osborn... |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
ukconstitutionallaw.org
Parliamentary sovereignty has traditionally been understood to mean that Parliament is free to enact legislation on any area of law that it chooses, and that Acts of the U.K. Parliament take precedence over subordinate legislation, regulation, or common law rule. Understood this way, parliamentary sovereignty is a constitutional principle that is couched explicitly in legal... |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
constitution-unit.com
Today sees the publication of a new book by the Unit's Meg Russell and Lisa James, The Parliamentary Battle over Brexit. Here the authors summarise some of its key findings about why parliament was drawn into such controversy over the implementation of Brexit. They reflect on what these events teach us about our constitution, as... |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
www.masslawblog.com
I've been belatedly reading Chris Miller's Chip War, so I'm particularly attuned to U.S.-China relations around technology. Of course, the topic of Miller's excellent book is advanced semiconductor chips, not social media apps. Nevertheless, the topic now occupying the attention of the Supreme Court and the president elect is the national security threat presented by [...] |
|
| | | |||
