/explore
|
You are here 
|
nullprogram.com | ||
| | | | |
ashvardanian.com
David Patterson had recently mentioned that (rephrasing): The programmers may benefit from using complex instruction sets directly, but it is increasingly challenging for compilers to automatically generate them in the right spots. In the last 3-4 years I gave a bunch of talks on the intricacies of SIMD programming, highlighting the divergence in hardware and software design in the past ten years. Chips are becoming bigger and more complicated to add more functionality, but the general-purpose compilers like GCC, LLVM, MSVC and ICC cannot keep up with the pace. Hardly any developer codes in Assembly today, hoping that the compiler will do the heavy lifting. |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
www.nickwilcox.com
In the previous article on auto-vectorization we looked at the different SIMD instruction set families on X86-64. We saw how he target-feature compiler flag and #[target_feature()] attribute gave us more control over the instructions used in the generated assembly. |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
huonw.github.io
An overview of my work on improving SIMD in Rust. |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
www.danhacks.com
[AI summary] A comprehensive guide listing resources and techniques to help software engineers prepare for coding interviews, covering data structures, algorithms, and practical practice tools. |
|
| | | |||
