Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
gill1109.com | ||
| | | | |
www.math.columbia.edu
|
|
| | | | | Philip Ball's Beyond Weird is the best popular survey I've seen of the contemporary state of discussions about the "interpretation" of quantum mechanics. It appeared earlier... | |
| | | | |
vikashkodati.com
|
|
| | | | | I have been meaning to connect these dots for a while and this weekend took up to task to pen down the first draft Nobel Prize in Physics 2022 on Entanglement The Nobel Prize in Physics 2022 was awarded jointly to Alain Aspect, John F. Clauser and Anton Zeilinger "for experiments with entangled photons, establishing... | |
| | | | |
drossbucket.com
|
|
| | | | | > Anybody who's not bothered by Bell's theorem has to have rocks in his head. - 'A distinguished Princeton physicist', as told to David Mermin This post is a long, idiosyncratic discussion of the Bell inequalities in quantum physics. There are plenty of good introductions already, so this is a bit of a weird thing... | |
| | | | |
selfawarepatterns.com
|
|
| | | A question long argued in the philosophy of science is the demarcation problem. How to we distinguish science from non-science? Karl Popper famously proposed falsifiability as a criteria. To be science, a theory must make predictions that could turn out to be wrong. It must be falsifiable. Theories that are amorphous or flexible enough to... | ||
