Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
www.livescience.com | ||
| | | | |
asd.gsfc.nasa.gov
|
|
| | | | | I get a lot of questions asking why the James Webb Space Telescope is infrared, and how its images can hope to compare to the (primarily) optical Hubble Space Telescope. Why would NASA build something that isn't going to capture beautiful images exactly like Hubble does? The short answer to this is that JWST will absolutely capture beautiful images of the universe, even if it won't see exactly what Hubble does. (Spoiler: it will see a lot of things even better.) There are legit scientific reasons for JWS... | |
| | | | |
webb.nasa.gov
|
|
| | | | | James Webb Space Telescope | |
| | | | |
theconversation.com
|
|
| | | | | Whether the universe will "end" at all is not certain, but all evidence suggests it will continue being humanity's cosmic home for a very, very long time. | |
| | | | |
www.space.com
|
|
| | | The three new bodies, likely dwarf planets like Pluto and Eris, reside in the Kuiper Belt, in the outer solar system. Even larger bodies - some as large as Mars or Earth - may exist even farther away from the sun, far beyond Pluto's orbit. | ||
