Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
mathwithbaddrawings.com | ||
| | | | |
jaydaigle.net
|
|
| | | | | This week we continue our exploration of what numbers are, and where mathematicians keep finding weird ones. Last time we defined the real numbers, but it took a lot of work. Now we'll see how truly strange they are. They're so strange that it's tempting to avoid them and stick with something simpler. But the real numbers do a much better job of describing modeling the parts of the world we care about. Their weirdness is exactly what we need to guarantee that a bunch of | |
| | | | |
alok.github.io
|
|
| | | | | Alok Singh's Blog | |
| | | | |
ianwrightsite.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | Are Cantor's higher infinities really real? | |
| | | | |
existentialtype.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | While reviewing some of the comments on my post about parallelism and concurrency, I noticed that the great fallacy about dynamic and static languages continues to hold people in its thrall. So, in the same "everything you know is wrong" spirit, let me try to set this straight: a dynamic language is a straightjacketed static | ||
