Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
blog.geomblog.org | ||
| | | | |
togelius.blogspot.com
|
|
| | | | | Computer science differs from most other academic fields in that conference papers are counted as real, citable publications. While journals... | |
| | | | |
www.pl-enthusiast.net
|
|
| | | | | A proposal by the ACM formalizes what many already know: Computer science major conference papers meet or exceed the quality of traditional journal papers. | |
| | | | |
windowsontheory.org
|
|
| | | | | Michael Mitzenmacher pointsto two posts ofSuresh Venkatasubramanian on the issue of so called "double blind reviews" (i.e., anonymous submissions) in theory conferences. In short, both Michael and Suresh think they are a good idea. I agree with much of their motivations, but, based on my experience in both non-blinded (e.g., STOC/FOCS) and blinded (e.g., CRYPTO) | |
| | | | |
awayofhappening.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | The Serials Crisis has always made the future of journal subscriptions unstable and headed for disaster. 6% yearly price increases,at a rate higher than inflation, with one party in the scholarly publishing process- the publishers - often pulling in30% profit margins? Nope. What makes this all the more shocking is that these price increases and... | ||
