/explore
|
You are here 
|
joecarlsmith.com | ||
| | | | |
www.greaterwrong.com
(I originally wrote this post as some rough notes on defining the alignment problem, with the intention of turning them into something more polished later. I've now started doing that, as part of a broader series introduced here. In particular, the first post in that series covers some of the same ground as section 1 of this post. It also has the same title. And some of essays in the series will draw on these notes as well.) People often talk about "solving the alignment problem." But what is it to do such a thing? I wanted to clarify my thinking about this topic, so I wrote up some notes. |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
blog.redwoodresearch.org
More thoughts on making deals with schemers |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
www.lesswrong.com
On boxing AIs, and on making deals with them. |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
www.lesswrong.com
Scaling inference With the release of OpenAI's o1 and o3 models, it seems likely that we are now contending with a new scaling paradigm: spending mor... |
|
| | | |||
