/explore
|
You are here 
|
www.lesswrong.com | ||
| | | | |
distill.pub
|
|
| | | | | If we want to train AI to do what humans want, we need to study humans. | |
| | | | |
www.greaterwrong.com
|
|
| | | | | Suppose that 1% of the world's resources are controlled by unaligned AI, and 99% of the world's resources are controlled by humans. We might hope that at least 99% of the universe's resources end up being used for stuff-humans-like (in expectation). Jessica Taylor argued for this conclusion in Strategies for Coalitions in Unit-Sum Games: if the humans divide into 99 groups each of which acquires influence as effectively as the unaligned AI, then by symmetry each group should end, up with as much influence as the AI, i.e. they should end up with 99% of the influence. | |
| | | | |
www.alignmentforum.org
|
|
| | | | | A collection of shorter posts by AI Alignment Forum user Richard_Ngo | |
| | | | |
www.lesswrong.com
|
|
| | | On the structure of the path to safe superintelligence, and some possible milestones along the way. | ||
