Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
jeremykun.wordpress.com | ||
| | | | |
www.jeremykun.com
|
|
| | | | | The first step in studying the sorts of possible computations (and more interestingly, those things which cannot be computed) is to define exactly what we mean by a "computation." At a high level, this is easy: a computation is simply a function. Given some input, produce the appropriate output. Unfortunately this is much too general. For instance, we could define almost anything we want in terms of functions. Let $ f$ be the function which accepts as input the date of California Super Lotto drawings, an... | |
| | | | |
accodeing.com
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The article discusses the debate around whether CSS3 is Turing complete, focusing on Eli Fox-Epstein's implementation of a Rule 110 automaton using CSS and HTML. It explains the theoretical concepts of Turing completeness, the limitations of real-world implementations, and the implications of such a claim. The author concludes that CSS appears to be Turing complete, though the discussion highlights the complexities and controversies surrounding this assertion. | |
| | | | |
pressron.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | Abstract: Machine and language models of computation differ so greatly in the computational complexity properties of their representation that they form two distinct classes that cannot be directly compared in a meaningful way. While machine models are self-contained, the properties of the language models indicate that they require a computationally powerful collaborator, and are better... | |
| | | | |
nikhilism.com
|
|
| | | |||
