/explore
|
You are here 
|
www.lesswrong.com | ||
| | | | |
www.greaterwrong.com
|
|
| | | | | Suppose that 1% of the world's resources are controlled by unaligned AI, and 99% of the world's resources are controlled by humans. We might hope that at least 99% of the universe's resources end up being used for stuff-humans-like (in expectation). Jessica Taylor argued for this conclusion in Strategies for Coalitions in Unit-Sum Games: if the humans divide into 99 groups each of which acquires influence as effectively as the unaligned AI, then by symmetry each group should end, up with as much influence as the AI, i.e. they should end up with 99% of the influence. | |
| | | | |
multiverseaccordingtoben.blogspot.com
|
|
| | | | | I recently wrote a blog post about my own AI project , but it attracted a bunch of adversarial comments from folks influenced by the Singula... | |
| | | | |
scottaaronson.blog
|
|
| | | | | Update (Nov. 22): Theoretical computer scientist and longtime friend-of-the-blog Boaz Barak writes to tell me that, coincidentally, he and Ben Edelman just released a big essay advocating a version of "Reform AI Alignment" on Boaz's Windows on Theory blog, as well as on LessWrong. (I warned Boaz that, having taken the momentous step of posting... | |
| | | | |
waitbutwhy.com
|
|
| | | Tim answers 46 reader questions about almost everything. | ||
