Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
raphlinus.github.io | ||
| | | | |
www.jeremykun.com
|
|
| | | | | A lot of people who like functional programming often give the reason that the functional style is simply more elegant than the imperative style. When compelled or inspired to explain (as I did in my old post, How I Learned to Love Functional Programming), they often point to the three "higher-order" functions map, fold, and filter, as providing a unifying framework for writing and reasoning about programs. But how unifying are they, really? | |
| | | | |
bartoszmilewski.com
|
|
| | | | | This is part 24 of Categories for Programmers. Previously: Comonads. See the Table of Contents. We've seen several formulations of a monoid: as a set, as a single-object category, as an object in a monoidal category. How much more juice can we squeeze out of this simple concept? Let's try. Take this definition of a... | |
| | | | |
hookrace.net
|
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
thatsmaths.com
|
|
| | | |||
