Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
francisbach.com | ||
| | | | |
djalil.chafai.net
|
|
| | | | | This post is mainly devoted to a probabilistic proof of a famous theorem due to Schoenberg on radial positive definite functions. Let us begin with a general notion: we say that \( {K:\mathbb{R}^d\times\mathbb{R}^d\rightarrow\mathbb{R}} \) is a positive definite kernel when \[ \forall n\geq1, \forall x_1,\ldots,x_n\in\mathbb{R}^d, \forall c\in\mathbb{C}^n, \quad\sum_{i=1}^n\sum_{j=1}^nc_iK(x_i,x_j)\bar{c}_j\geq0. \] When \( {K} \) is symmetric, i.e. \( {K(x,y)=K(y,x)} \) for... | |
| | | | |
stephenmalina.com
|
|
| | | | | Matrix Potpourri # As part of reviewing Linear Algebra for my Machine Learning class, I've noticed there's a bunch of matrix terminology that I didn't encounter during my proof-based self-study of LA from Linear Algebra Done Right. This post is mostly intended to consolidate my own understanding and to act as a reference to future me, but if it also helps others in a similar position, that's even better! | |
| | | | |
windowsontheory.org
|
|
| | | | | Previous post: ML theory with bad drawings Next post: What do neural networks learn and when do they learn it, see also all seminar posts and course webpage. Lecture video (starts in slide 2 since I hit record button 30 seconds too late - sorry!) - slides (pdf) - slides (Powerpoint with ink and animation)... | |
| | | | |
www.hongliangjie.com
|
|
| | | |||
