Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
errorstatistics.com | ||
| | | | |
blog.apaonline.org
|
|
| | | | | "[C]onfusion about the foundations of the subject is responsible, in my opinion, for much of the misuse of the statistics that one meets in fields of application such as medicine, psychology, sociology, economics, and so forth." (George Barnard 1985, p. 2) "Relevant clarifications of the nature and roles of statistical evidence in scientific research may | |
| | | | |
apgaylard.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | A Commentary On In Pursuit Of EvidenceBy Kate Chatfield RSHom I've wanted to critique Kate Chatfield's philosophical diatribe for some time. It can be found on the Society of Homeopath's (SoH)website. The main reasons for my interest were that when I first came across this piece I was immediately struck by it's misrepresentation of clinical... | |
| | | | |
www.quackometer.net
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The discussion centers around the efficacy and historical context of homeopathy, particularly in relation to Charles Darwin's health. Critics argue that the evidence for homeopathy's effectiveness is anecdotal and lacks scientific validation, while proponents highlight historical cases like Darwin's supposed recovery as proof of its efficacy. The debate touches on issues of medical science, anecdotal evidence, and the reliability of historical diagnoses. The conversation also includes critiques of the peer-review process and the dissemination of information on alternative medicine. | |
| | | | |
4gravitons.com
|
|
| | | A paper about scientific fraud has been making the rounds in social media lately. The authors gather evidence of large-scale networks of fraudsters across multiple fields, from teams of editors that fast-track fraudulent research to businesses that take over journals, sell spots for articles, and then move on to a new target when the journal... | ||
