/explore
|
You are here |
www.theguardian.com | ||
| | | | |
inforrm.org
Mr Justice Mann's judgment in Sir Cliff Richard's claim against the BBC ([2018] EWHC 1837 (Ch)) was the biggest media law story of the week (and, indeed, of the year so far). |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
www.cyberleagle.com
A blogpost headed "The Online Safety Act: A First Amendment for the UK" lacks nothing in shock value. The one thing that we might have th... |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
ukconstitutionallaw.org
This article suggests that the Supreme Court's interpretation of section 28(7) has created such problems in relation to the legislative competence of the Scottish Parliament that the provision needs to be amended, repealed or qualified. Text The terms of section 28(7) appear innocuous. Section 28(1) confers power on the Scottish Parliament to make laws to... |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
ukconstitutionallaw.org
In For Women Scotland v The Scottish Ministers the UK Supreme Court rejected the contention that possession of a Gender Recognition Certificate changes an individual's sex for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010, maintaining equality of status for all those protected under the characteristic of gender reassignment and ensuring that biological women are protected... |
|
| | | |||